I'd like that pref option also.

28

(11 replies, posted in Archives)

Thanks. I actually looked at the link. The more I think about it, without actually using it, I'm thinking there's little doubt for those of us with huge libraries and especially with deep trees of long file names, a window would be best. More, roll in search and drag/drop, and this solution would be SO much better than iTunes and Play.

29

(11 replies, posted in Archives)

Could search work in a utility window?

30

(11 replies, posted in Archives)

I'm game! OTOH, I just got my nerve up to estimate just what I'm talking about in my eventual library and it'll be at least 200 GBs. Hell, I'll need some kind of search function. Best I can tell Cog will search only the files in the main window. Would search be able if the files drawer was a separate window?

31

(11 replies, posted in Archives)

That'd work as long as drag/drop worked.

32

(11 replies, posted in Archives)

Well, besides the fact that some classical names can get get quite long, there's also the not all that uncommon instance where said long title is part of an overall piece which is part of a CD which is part of a set which is a part of a compilation. Talk about a tree's branches!

When I think of the Library my collection will be once I retire and get it all done, I can see having the greater horizontal space being much more valuable than the vertical space of the side drawer. That is, presently I will have to scroll down through a 6 inch tall drawer containing upwards of 2,000 CDs - all the info showing in the drawer being truncated or otherwise funky to decipher. Were the drawer below it would be much wider, accommodating most if not all information, and considering having to scroll through upwards of 2,000 CDs, not much more scrolling in a 3 inch tall drawer than the aforementioned 6 inch tall drawer. Still, a shitload of a lot of scrolling no matter where.

33

(11 replies, posted in Archives)

No thoughts at all, y'all?

34

(11 replies, posted in Archives)

How hard would this be to implement? My problem is I presently have a small screen. My Playlists have longish names and I like to have a wide as possible main window, so even on a wider screen I'd probably still want much more room for the file drawer and want to have even more in the main window. I seldom if ever use the Info Drawer. I'm not sure I wouldn't rather have to do a lot of scrolling through playlists than have the "narrow" main window and file drawer. But then, I also wonder if I wouldn't just make the main window shorter and have the file drawer somewhat taller if on the bottom. Just thinking out loud as it were. Still love Cog, and every time I revisit Play am glad for Cog.

35

(3 replies, posted in Features)

Looking forward to it.

36

(3 replies, posted in Features)

100% agreement here.

Play has gone the Toolbar route and done a very good job of it. I continue to prefer Cog but would very much like to see some experimentation with the toolbar idea.

39

(13 replies, posted in Development)

40

(13 replies, posted in Development)

Works fine for me, too. Much thanks for this my first Christmas present.  big_smile

41

(13 replies, posted in Development)

Let me introduce you to my little friend. No, wait. Wrong movie.

Oh-h-h, James. No, wait. Wrong Spader. (Wrong James, too.)

Whatever.

THANK YOU for the work!

Happy holidays and all that rot,

Thirded.

43

(4 replies, posted in Help)

44

(41 replies, posted in Archives)

Heh. Most not notice? Maybe. As an old bass player I might have (might, I say). Still this is about music. Gotta show respect.

And speaking of which: THANK YOU ALL for your work!

Symlinks not my idea but was from these forums. I use the CM plugin, too. Glad things are good for you.

46

(1 replies, posted in Help)

I make a bunch of use of symlinks. Aliases don't work in pre-Leopard - Haven't tested Leopard aliases.

48

(28 replies, posted in Development)

And the Virtual Memory management is the best reason to upgrade.

I'd love this and do make much use of Synergy in iTunes.

50

(11 replies, posted in Features)

Back to the OP's "pause," why not just hit Command-P? You're at the keyboard anyway about to play/watch something else.