Topic: Cross platform woes
Hey guys
This post is not particularly directed at cog, but more of a general discussion.
Do you prefer cross platform apps?
In my search for the perfect (mostly open source) setup of my mac I have come across maybe hundreds of apps. Some proud themselves of being 'cross platform'. My initiate reaction is : that's nice. Larger userbase, better support forums etc.
On the other hand OS X native sounds pretty nifty too. The devs don't have to cut corners on the code, to make sure it fits everywhere. One UI means more time spent on just that one.
And that is why I post this.
I was looking for a rss-reader app, and stumbled on Vienna and RSSOwl. Both open source.
RSSOwl seems to be more customizable with plugins and whatnots. But it looks and feels like a windows program turned into a mac app.
Vienna is pretty. Every feature seem familiar and intuitive. But it has fewer features.
What do you prefer?
Some other programs.
Azureus: I don't like the interface, but I like the features.
Transmission: Pretty, intuitive, very large UI (EDIT: darn, vspader is right (look below))
Firefox... I gues they have the manpower to handle more than one user interface, but even they handle some features differently than best practice on mac
VideoLan, looks and feels windowsy (or maybe linuxy)
Quicktime... Ahh come on.
Audacity again windowslike, but no free alternative
That is what I could think of. I guess there are pros and cons to everything, but at Audacity, Azures and videolan are pretty large projects, I think they could benefit from investing more in the UI on mac.
Subject is open for debate
Last edited by Zitz (2008-03-09 10:24:08)